SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 581

G.B.PATTANAIK, M.K.MUKHERJEE
Sharmas Nursing Home – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Admn – Respondent


(1) SHRI P. Shankar, Respondent 2 herein, (hereinafter referred to as "the complainant") filed a complaint in the court of the Metropolitan Magistrate, New Delhi, alleging commission of offences under S. 420, 336 and 338 of the Indian Penal Code by the three appellants and one Dr S.C. Madan. The allegation made in the complaint is that the complainants brother was to undergo a minor operation and for that purpose, he (the complainant) was looking for a good nursing home with adequate surgical facilities. He came across an advertisement of Appellant I, of which Appellant 2 is a Director, wherein it was mentioned that it had all modem facilities and that all its rooms were air-conditioned. He, therefore, approached Appellant 2, who also confirmed that besides other facilities, air-conditioned rooms were available. Impressed by his statements, the complainant got his brother admitted for the necessary operation, but found, to his utter surprise, that the room that was provided to him was not air-conditioned, even though he was charged for such a room. The other allegations in the complaint are that Dr Madan did not perform the operation properly and that adequate post operatio




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top