1. Inquiry into irregular land conversions and plot allotments. (Para 2 , 4 )
Back
Next 
1999 Supreme(SC) 140
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
G.T.Nanavati : S.P.Bharucha : S.S.M.Quadri
Noida Entrepreneurs Assocn.
Versus
Noida
Case No. : 150 of 1997
Date of Decision : 2/5/99
The court emphasized the necessity of awaiting a comprehensive inquiry report before making a determination and directed administrative action against irregular plot allotments based on records provided by an investigative agency.
Headnote:(A) Administrative Law - Inquiry and Reports - Procedural requirement for reports to be submitted in sealed envelopes to the court - If a report is partial and a wider reference is pending, the court may defer consideration until the comprehensive report is submitted. (Para 2)
(B) Administrative Action - Authority directed to take action regarding irregular conversions and allotment of plots based on records provided by an investigative agency. (Para 4)
Facts of the case:
A report was submitted by a revenue authority in response to a court order, but it was restricted to specific allegations. A broader inquiry initiated by the state government remained pending. Additionally, there were allegations of irregular conversions and allotments of plots.
Findings of Court:
The court held that the matter should be considered only after the full report on the wider reference is completed. It directed the completion of the inquiry within three months.
Issues: Whether the court should act on a partial report and the mechanism for addressing irregular plot allotments.
Ratio Decidendi: The court reasoned that for a comprehensive adjudication, the full report on the state's reference is necessary. It also emphasized the need for the administrative authority to act on irregular allotments using records from the investigative agency.
Result: Directions issued for the completion of the inquiry within three months and for the authority to take action on irregular allotments.
Legal Category Hierarchy
Table of Contents
2. Matter should be considered only after the completion of the comprehensive inquiry based on the State Government's reference. (Para 2 )
3. Judicial consideration of a matter may be deferred until a comprehensive administrative inquiry report is completed. (Para 2 )
4. Directions for completion of inquiry, resealing of documents, and administrative action on irregular allotments based on investigative records. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 )
5. How should the court handle sealed documents that have been inadvertently opened?
The court may order the retrieval of the original and copies of the documents to be resealed and kept in the custody of the Registrar until further orders. (Para 1 )
6. When should a court consider a matter involving a pending administrative inquiry?
The court may determine that the matter be considered only after the relevant authority has completed the full inquiry and submitted the final report. (Para 2 )
7. Can a court direct an administrative body to take action based on records from an investigative agency?
Yes, the court can direct an administrative authority to take action regarding irregularities by ordering an investigative agency to furnish the relevant records. (Para 4 )
(1) OUR order dated 8/1/1999 required the Chairman of the Board of Revenue to respond to that order in a letter contained in sealed envelope addressed to the Registrar (Judl.) to be produced before us at the next date of hearing. That letter has, it would appear inadvertently, been opened and the original is in the file of these proceedings. Photostat copies thereof have been placed in the paper books. All these shall be retrieved and the original and the xerox copies shall be sealed and kept in the custody of the Registrar (Judl.) until further orders.
(2) IN the said letter the Chairman has indicated that the report that he has made is restricted to the allegations made in the affidavit of respondent No. 7 and that the inquiry on the wider reference made by the State government is still pending. It is appropriate, having regard to the orders earlier made, that the matter should be considered only after the Chairman has made his report on the reference made by the State Government.
(3) THE Chairman should complete that inquiry within a period of three months from today and send to the court, again in a sealed envelope addressed to the Registrar (Judl.), a copy of his report. The sealed envelope shall be placed before us.
(4) NOIDA shall take action in respect of the alleged irregular conversions and allotment of plots. The C.B.I, shall furnish to NOIDA a copy of the records relating to the persons in regard to whom the alleged irregular conversions and allotments have been made.
(5) THE State of U.P. shall be at liberty to file a further affidavit in furtherance of the order dated 8/1/1999.
(6) LIST for directions in the first week of May, 1999. W.P. (C) No. 529/98: 7. List as above.
