SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 1226

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
NAHAR SINGH
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh
Decided on November 28, 1995

The court's decision was based on the lapse of proceedings under Section 11-A of the Land Acquisition Act due to the delay in making the award under Section 11.

Headnote:

DELAY - Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - The court allowed the appeal based on the delay in taking possession of the land and the lapse of proceedings under Section 11-A after the award under Section 11 was not made within two years.

Fact of the Case:

The notification and declaration under the Land Acquisition Act were published, but possession of the land was not taken within the specified time. The appellant claimed possession and presented evidence that the land was no longer necessary.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the notification and declaration no longer subsisted due to the lapse of proceedings under Section 11-A, and accordingly allowed the appeal.

Issues: Delay in taking possession, lapse of proceedings under Section 11-A

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the provisions of Section 11-A, which stipulates that if the award under Section 11 is not made within two years, all proceedings under Sections 4 and 6 shall stand lapsed.

Final Decision: The appeal was allowed with no costs.

( 1 ) DELAY condoned. Substitution allowed.

( 2 ) NOTIFICATION under Section 4 (1 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short "the Act") was published on 25/6/1974. Declaration under Section 6 was published on 3/7/1974 dispensing with the enquiry under Section 5-A after the governor had exercised his power under Section 17 (4 of the Act.

( 3 ) IT is not clear from the record that the possession of the land was taken after 15 days from the date of service of the notice under Section 9 on the appellant. The appellant has asserted that he has been in possession of the land but no counter has been filed. In support thereof, the appellant has also placed on record the resolution dated 27/12/1977 of Gram Sabha staling that the other land has already been allotted to 30 eligible persons of the village and the land in question no longer is necessary. After the Amendment Act 68 of 1984 was brought into force w. e. f. 24/9/1984, Section 11 -A operates in the field. It envisages that if the award under Section 11 has not been made within two years from the date of coming into force of the Amendment Act, all the proceedings under S. 4 and 6 shall stand lapsed. In view of the fact that no steps appeared to have been taken within time, the notification under Section 4 (1 and declaration under Section 6 no longer subsist.

( 4 ) ACCORDINGLY, the appeal is allowed. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top