SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(SC) 123

S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI, V.BALAKRISHNA ERADI
Chiranji Lal – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


( 1 ) IN this appeal the complainants have filed application for permission to compound the offence. The complainants also have appeared before us personally and have stated that they have compromised the matter and have received compensation and no is now left in their hearts against the appellant. Counsel for the State also has no objection to the offence being compounded. We therefore allow the application and sanction the compounding of the offence under S. 320 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The appeal is accordingly allowed and the accused acquitted of the charges framed against him.

.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top