SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(SC) 1834

FAIZAN UDDIN, KULDIP SINGH
Common Cause (A Registered Society) – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


( 1 ) THE question before this Court in Common Cause v. Unon of India and others, Writ Petition (C) No. 26/95 was whether the allotmnts of retail ortlets for petroleum products (Petrol Pumps) were illegal and as such liable to be quashed. This Court by the judgment dated 25/09/1996 (reported in 1996 AIR SCW 3696) came to the conclusion that the allotments made by Captain Satish Sharma were arbitrary, discriminatory, mala fide, wholly illegal and as such were liable to be quashed. This Court reached the said findings on the following reasoning :

"all the 15 allotments - discussed above - have been made by the Minister in a stereotyped manner. The application have not been officially received by the Petroleum Ministry. There is no receipt - entry on any of the application. The applicants seem to have approached the Minister directly. None of the application have been dealt with in any of the branches of the Ministry. There is nothing on the record to indicate that the Minister kept any criteria in view while making the allotments. How the appellants came to know about the availability of the petrol pumps is not known. No advertisement was made to invite the applications. There is noth

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top