SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 191

ALTAMAS KABIR, B.P.SINGH
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Munshi Ram (Dead) by Lrs. – Respondent


Judgment

B.P. Singh, J.—These appeals by special leave are directed against the common judgment and order dated 27th November, 1995 of the High Court for the States of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh dismissing the writ petitions filed by the appellant-UOI challenging various orders determining the compensation payable to the respondents herein under section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The relevant facts of the case are these:—

2. Notification under Section 4(1) read with sub-section 1 of Section 17 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) was published on June 18, 1984. Land measuring 3609 Kanals and 16 marlas were sought to be acquired for extension of the Hissar Cantonement Area. By his award of 31st January, 1986 the Land Acquisition Collector categorised the lands into 5 categories and granted compensation at different rates for each category. A reference was made under Section 18 of the Act. The Reference Court by its award dated 23rd October, 1988 enhanced the compensation payable to the claimants. However, it divided the lands into only two categories, namely, block A and block B.

3. Not satisfied with the decree of the Reference Court












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top