SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 156

A.R.LAKSHMANAN, A.K.MATHUR
Ushabai – Appellant
Versus
Balkrishna Biharilal – Respondent


Judgment

A.K. Mathur, J.—Leave granted.

2. This appeal is directed against an order passed by the learned Single Judge of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in Second Appeal No. 382 of 1999 whereby learned Single Judge allowed the appeal of the defendants and set aside the decree of eviction granted by the first appellate court. Hence this appeal.

3. The original owner of the property which is situated in Khargaon Nagar was one Madhav Rao. He let out the suit premises to one Balakrishna on a monthly rent of Rs. 50/- on 1.12.1950. Later on a rent note was executed inter se parties on 24.11.1955. On 3.3.1964 Madhav Rao felt the need of money and therefore, he took a sum of Rs. 15,000/- from Balakrishna and executed a mortgage deed on 3.3.1964 in favour of Balakrishna’s two sons namely Vijaykumar and Shyam Sunder mortgaging the suit premises. Madhav Rao then effected a partition of his properties including the present suit house which fell in the share of his son, Mahesh Parsai. Mahesh became the owner of the suit house. On his death, the present plaintiffs who are the widow and sons respectively succeeded to the suit premises and became owners. The plaintiffs claiming to be the owners and la
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top