B.P.SINGH, ALTAMAS KABIR
Vidyawati Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Bhakti Hari Nayak – Respondent
Judgment
Altamas Kabir, J.—The submissions advanced in this appeal by way of special leave necessitates a brief glance into the historical origin of the Calcutta High Court.
2. In August 1861, the British Parliament passed the Indian High Courts Act which empowered the Crown to establish, by Letters Patent, High Courts of Judicature at Calcutta, Madras and Bombay. Consequent to such authority, the Letters Patent dated 14th May, 1862 was issued establishing the High Court of Judicature at Calcutta. By subsequent Letters Patent dated 26th June, 1862, the High Court at Bombay and Madras were also established.
3. The Letters Patent empowered the High Court of Calcutta to exercise Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction within the local limits of the Presidency town of Calcutta as might be prescribed by a competent Legislative Authority for India. Within such local limits, the High Court was authorized to try and determine suits of every description, except those falling within the jurisdiction of the Small Causes Court at Calcutta. Apart from its Original Jurisdiction, the Letters Patent vested the High Court with wide powers including appellate powers from the Courts of Original Jurisdictio
Salem Advocate Bar Association, Tamil Nadu v. Union of India
State of Kerala v. M.S. Mani & Ors.
P.S. Sathappan (Dead) by Lrs. v. Andhra Bank Ltd. & Ors.
State of M.P. v. M.B. Narasimhan
Life Insurance Corporation of India v. D.J. Bahadur
Iridium India Telecom Ltd. v. Motorola Inc.
Mr. Shaikh Salim Haji Abdul Khayumsab v. Mr. Kumar & Ors.
Delhi Development Authority v. Kochhar Construction Work & Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.