SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(SC) 18

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
RAJGARIAH OIL MILLS PRIVATE LIMITED
Versus
State of Haryana
Decided on, January 28, 1986

The judgment did not establish a central legal point.

Headnote:

Judgment - Civil Appeals - Summary not available

Fact of the Case:

The court did not provide a detailed fact of the case in the judgment.

Finding of the Court:

The court did not provide a detailed finding in the judgment.

Issues: The court did not specify the issues in the judgment.

Ratio Decidendi: The court did not provide a detailed ratio decidendi in the judgment.

Final Decision: The writ petition is disposed of accordingly with no costs.

Judgment-

VENKATARAMIAH

( 1 ) IN view of the judgment delivered by us today in Civil Appeals Nos. 2808-18. 4166-70, 4183 of 1985 and 263-343 of 1986 - 0m Parkash Agarwal v. Giri Raj Kishori there is no need to pass any separate order in this writ petition. It is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top