SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(SC) 131

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
NATIONAL MUSEUM NON GAZETTED EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION
Versus
Union of India
Decided on, February 10, 1988

Headnote:

Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 32 - Close proximity of national Museum - Conditions of services - Petitioners are Gallery Attendants of National Museum located at New Delhi - In this application Article Constitution they have alleged discrimination so far as their service conditions are concerned by contending that they are equal in every respect with Record Attendants in National Archives also located at New Delhi in close proximity of national Museum yet in regard to pay and allied conditions of services discrimination has been made in report of Fourth Pay Commission and they are prejudiced on that account – Held, Notice was issued and respondents were called upon to file their return - Several adjournments have been given to enable Union of India to file its counter affidavit - In spite of repeated adjournments no reply has been filed - In circumstances court are left with no option but accept factual allegations petitioners - Qualification for job nature and conditions of work prescribed for Gallery Attendants and Record Attendants in two institutions are same - Fourth Pay Commission has given benefits confined to Record Attendants while claim of Gallery attendants has not been taken into account - In addition to pleading of petitioners this fact has been specifically stated in letter of Director National Museum sent to administrative Department petitioners have produced two communications Director as annexure to writ petition - These letters do support claim of petitioners - Petitioners are justified to claim equal pay for equal work – Court are therefore of view that petitioners are entitled to same scale of pay and other service benefits as Record attendants in National Archives – Order accordingly

( 1 ) PETITIONERS are Gallery Attendants of the National Museum located at New Delhi. In this application under Article 32 of the Constitution they have alleged discrimination so far as their service conditions are concerned by contending that they are equal in every respect with Record Attendants in the National Archives also located at New Delhi in the close proximity of national Museum ; yet in regard to pay and allied conditions of services discrimination has been made in the report of the Fourth Pay Commission and they are prejudiced on that account.

( 2 ) NOTICE was issued and the respondents were called upon to file their return. Several adjournments have been given to enable the Union of India to file its counter-affidavit. In spite of repeated adjournments no reply hasbeen filed. In the circumstances we are left with no option but accept the factual allegations of the petitioners. The qualification for the job, nature and conditions of work prescribed for Gallery Attendants and Record Attendants in the two institutions are the same. The Fourth Pay Commission has given benefits confined to the Record Attendants while the claim of the Gallery attendants has not been taken into account.

( 3 ) IN addition to the pleading of the petitioners, this fact has been specifically stated in the letter of the Director of the National Museum sent to the administrative Department and the petitioners have produced two communications of the Director as annexures to the writ petition. These letters do support the claim of the petitioners. Petitioners are justified to claim equal pay for equal work. We are, therefore, of the view that the petitioners are entitled to the same scale of pay and other service benefits as of the Record attendants in the National Archives.

( 4 ) A direction shall issue to the respondents to equate the service conditions of the petitioners with those of the Record Attendants of the National archives within three months hence, with effect from 1/04/1988. The petitioners are entitled to the costs of the petition. Hearing fee is assessed at Rs. 2,500. 00.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top