SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(SC) 131

RANGANATH MISRA, S.NATARAJAN, M.N.VENKATACHALIAH
National Museum Non Gazetted Employees Association – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


( 1 ) PETITIONERS are Gallery Attendants of the National Museum located at New Delhi. In this application under Article 32 of the Constitution they have alleged discrimination so far as their service conditions are concerned by contending that they are equal in every respect with Record Attendants in the National Archives also located at New Delhi in the close proximity of national Museum ; yet in regard to pay and allied conditions of services discrimination has been made in the report of the Fourth Pay Commission and they are prejudiced on that account.

( 2 ) NOTICE was issued and the respondents were called upon to file their return. Several adjournments have been given to enable the Union of India to file its counter-affidavit. In spite of repeated adjournments no reply hasbeen filed. In the circumstances we are left with no option but accept the factual allegations of the petitioners. The qualification for the job, nature and conditions of work prescribed for Gallery Attendants and Record Attendants in the two institutions are the same. The Fourth Pay Commission has given benefits confined to the Record Attendants while the claim of the Gallery attendants has not been taken in


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top