SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(SC) 409

SUHAS C.SEN, SUJATA V.MANOHAR, A.M.AHMADI
United Breweries – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


Judgment-

SEN, J.

( 1 ) THIS case along with a number of other cases was heard by S. P. Bharucha and Faizan Uddin, JJ. who passed the following order :-

during the course of the arguments, the judgment of a Bench of two learned Judges in State of Maharashtra, Bombay v. Britannia Biscuits Company Ltd. , 1995 Supp (2) SCC 72, has been cited. Our attention has also been drawn to the judgment of a Bench of three learned Judges in Punjab Distilling Industries Limited v. Commr. of Income-tax, Simla, 1959 Supp (1) SCR 683: (AIR 1959 SC 346 ). Having regard to these judgments, we think that these appeals require the consideration of a larger Bench. The larger Bench may also take note of the judgment dated 11/09/1996 in C. A. Nos. 11864-67 of 1996 (reported in 1996 AIR SCW 4126), Commr. of Income-tax, Madurai v. T. V. Sundaram Iyengar and Sons Ltd. "

( 2 ) THE United Breweries (hereinafter referred to as ub) supplies at Hyderabad two brands of beer - (1) U. B. Export Lager, and (2) Sun Lager. The dispute between UB and Andhra Pradesh Sales Tax Authority was as regards the crates and bottles in which the beer was supplied. The case of UB was that when beer was sold bottles and crates were not s








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top