M.FAZAL ALI SYED, V.BALAKRISHNA ERADI
Lalit Mohan Mondal – Appellant
Versus
Benoyendra Nath Chatterjee – Respondent
Judgment-
S. MURTAZA FAZAL ALI
( 1 ) WE have heard counsel for the parties and have gone through the judgment of the High Court. We agree with the High Court that against an order passed in appeal under S. 341 of the Code of Criminal Procedure , the order would not be revisable by the High Court under S. 397 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure , but there can be no doubt that the Court is entitled to examine the matter under Sec. 482 of the criminal P. C. which expressly overrules the bar contained in S. 341 of the Code. In the instant case, the High Court has merely indicated that this is not a fit case for invoking the inherent power without at all applying its mind whether or not the circumstances, it was a fit case for filing a complaint, particularly when the matter rested merely on oath against oath.
( 2 ) FOR this reason, therefore, we allow this appeal and remit the case to the High Court to send for the records and satisfy itself whether the order directing complaint to be filed is expedient in the interest of justice, so as to attract its inherent jurisdiction under S. 482 of the Code. Meanwhile, further proceedings will be stayed. Order accordingly.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.