SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(SC) 283

M.FAZAL ALI SYED, R.B.MISRA
Ram Shanker – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


( 1 ) AFTER hearing counsel for the parties, we find that it was not a case under S. 307, Indian Penal Code at all. We, therefore, convert the conviction of appellant Ram Shanker from one under S. 307, Indian Penal Code to that under S. 325/34, IPC. An application has been made by both the parties that the offence may be compounded. In the circumstances, therefore, so far as the offence under S. 325/34, Indian Penal Code is concerned, we sanction the compounding of the offence as the parties have settled their differences and acquit Ram Shanker of the charge framed against him. The offence under S. 323, Indian Penal Code is compoundable without permission of the court, and as Sheo Shanker and Nand Kumar have compounded the offence, they are acquitted of the charges framed against them.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top