SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(SC) 78

A.P.SEN, B.C.RAY
Employees Of Engineers India LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Engineers India LTD. – Respondent


( 1 ) DR L. M. Singhvi, learned counsel appearing for the Union of india states on instructions that the central government has signified its willingness to refer to a High Power Committee, the question regarding the revision of pay scales, additional DA. compensatory and other allowances, and such other incidental aspects relating to the employees working in the Public Sector Undertakings belonging to the government of India governed by the central pattern of pay scale and da. It is stated that a High Power Committee of two members consisting of a retired Judge of the Supreme court of India and a senior civil servant of the government of India, of which the retired Judge of the Supreme court would be the Chairman to go into the various aspects relating to service matters viz. . revision of pay scales, DA, compensatory and other allowances and such other incidental aspects pertaining to the employees working in the public sector on the central pay scales and DA pattern. He placed before us a letter addressed to the government of India dated 12/03/1986. the material portion of which reads as follows :

THE government after taking into consideration the facts stated in the writ petitio






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top