SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(SC) 414

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
RAMESH LAXMAN PARDESI
Versus
State of Maharashtra
Decided on : 10-04-1987

Headnote:

Constitution of India, 1950 – Injury – Offence of death - Prosecution case at trial was that on midnight intervening between July appellant along with others went to traffic island near Band resituated on Linking Road where bad shah was doing business of vending eatables from his handcart kept on that island - Eatables included heavy non-vegetarian items – Bad shah Public Witness was assisted in his trade by his brother in law Sedately Public Witness some other servants - It is alleged that appellant along with his friends had reached there to celebrate victory of caroms game of Caroms Club run by accused and on reaching near cart accused placed order for meat and other preparations – Held, Counsel referred to series decisions of this court and contended that in such situation when provocation without premeditation and in heat of passion on spur of moment one injury is inflicted it could not be that accused had intention of causing death and this is what has been propounded in number of decisions of this court - Counsel for Station other hand contended that there was some previous trouble between parties and that furnished - Some motive and on that basis an attempt was made to contend that this opportunity was taken to seek vengeance - This story of some earlier trouble and motive suggested by prosecution has not been accepted by both courts below and it is also clear that there was not pre arranged plan - Admittedly it was by chance that party also chose to go to same spot - Handcart of bad shah at that odd hour at night where appellant and his friends had already reached - It is not as if seeing deceased and his friends that appellant and his friends reached - On contrary and his friends arrived later - In this view matter both courts were right in coming to conclusion that hot exchange of filthy language resulted in some kind of provocation and in heat of passion without premeditation this injury was inflicted and in circumstances it could not be that it was inflicted with an intention to cause death - Only intention which could be attributed to appellant in circumstances of this case could be to cause such bodily injury as is likely to cause death - Consequently appellant could only be convicted for an offence Part but as appellant has already served out more than years in our opinion sentence already undergone will meet ends of justice – Appeal allowed

Judgment-

OZA

( 1 ) THIS appeal has been filed after obtaining leave from this court against the conviction of the appellant under S. 302 and sentence of imprisonment for life recorded by Additional. Sessions judge Greater Bombay in Sessions Case No. 204/73 and maintained on appeal by High court of Bombay by its judgment dated 17/10/1977.

( 2 ) THE prosecution case at the trial was that on the midnight intervening between July 25/26, 1972 the appellant along with others went to traffic island near Bandra, situated on Linking Road where badshah Umarbax was doing the business of vending eatables from his handcart kept on that island. The eatables included heavy non-vegetarian items. Badshah, Public Witness 4 was assisted in his trade by his brother-in-law Sadatali, Public Witness 5 and some other servants. It is alleged that the appellant alongwith his friends had reached there to celebrate the victory of caroms game of the Caroms Club run by accused 1 and on reaching near the cart accused 1 and 4 placed order for meat and other preparations.

( 3 ) AS the dishes were getting ready the deceased Sheroo Lala came there, driving his red Fiat car MRT 566. By his side was his relation Ahmedkhan, who, though cited as a witness, was not examined at the trial, as it was reported that he was not available. In the back seat sat Chutkan, Public Witness 2 and Alikhan, Public Witness 3. It appears that chutkan and Kala Topi met in a hotel in Khar and while they were conversing, Sheroo Lala came there together with Alikhan in the car from Santa Cruz side. After gossipping for some time Sheroo Lala proposed to go to Badshahs handcart on Linking Road, for taking food. That is how all of them arrived near the Badshahs handcart where the appellant and his friends had reached earlier. This car went and stopped very near the handcart. The other cars which brought the appellant and his friends earlier were parked there. It was at 11. 45 p. m. and there were two petromax lights burning on the handcart. There were also some street lights. It is alleged that sheroo Lala got down from his car and proceeded for placing the order and just as he did so he was stopped by Maruti, one of the accused persons who addressed him in a loud tone. This was followed by heated exchange of words and suddenly the present appellant -- accused 1 in the courts below who was behind Maruti came forward with an open Rampuri knife and inflicted a stab wound in the stomach of Sheroo. The other accused also assaulted Sheroo Lala with a stick on the head. The other persons who were tried, it is alleged were also there. It is alleged that in the meantime Chutkan, Kala Topi and Ahmedkhan had come near the spot where Sheroo was stabbedand Sheroo keeping his hand on the injury walked towards the north and ultimately fell down in a pool of blood collected on the spot. Chutkan, Kala Topi and Ahmedkhan, it is alleged, got down from the car probably to meet the assailants but just then Maruti who was accused 3 in the courts below, picked up a suri from Badshahs handcart and aimed a blow at Chutkan but Chutkan grappled with it and got hurt near the thumb on the palm of his right hand. Another blow was aimed by Maruti, but it was warded off by Chutkan and it is alleged that at that time accused 4 gave a blow with a bamboo on the right hand of Chutkan and accused 7 gave a blow on ahmedkhan with an iron bar. Ahmedkhan fell down and sometime later he went away himself. It is alleged that when this was happening, kala Topi removed a bamboo from Badshahs handcart and started flourishing it in defence. The others also were doing something to defend themselves. According to the prosecution in this exchange some injuries were inflicted but so far as the present appeal is concerned, we are not concerned with it as we are concerned with only the appellant Ramesh Laxman Pardesi.

( 4 ) CHUTKAN and Kala Topi, in the meantime, managed to board a taxi and went to K. E, M. Hospital for treatment. They reache









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top