SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(SC) 443

B.C.RAY, M.P.THAKKAR
Vijaysingh Liladhar: Nathumal Rajmal Baldota – Appellant
Versus
Special Land Acquisition Officer – Respondent


Judgment-

THAKKAR

( 1 ) THE appellants are original claimants whose lands were placed under acquisition pursuant to a notification under S. 4 of the Land Acquisition Act published on 8/03/1956. By the said notification a large block of undeveloped agricultural land admeasuring about 101 acres 33 gunthas was placed under acquisition for a public purpose viz. : for constructionof the headquarters, Poona Rural Police Charge. Dissatisfied with the determination of market value made by the High court by its judgment dated 1/03/1972 the appellants have approached this court by way of the present appeals. Another land owner whose lands were placed under acquisition, by the identical notification for the identical purpose has also approached this court by way of Civil Appeals Nos. 2721 and 2722 (N) of 1972 which are being disposed of by a separate judgment. Since the lands belonging to the appellants were acquired under the identical notification and the appeals relating to said lands were also disposed of by the High court by the aforesaid common judgment rendered on 1/03/1972, the present appeals by special leave were heard together with the aforesaid two appeals. As the questions involved








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top