RANGANATH MISRA, KULDIP SINGH
K. Venkataseshiah – Appellant
Versus
Kandururamasubbamma – Respondent
( 1 ) THE special leave petition under Article 136 of the Constitution is directed against the affirming judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High court in a suit for title and injunction.
( 2 ) IN view of the fact that a petition of compromise in respect of the entire subject matter of litigation has been filed in this court it is unnecessary to refer to the facts leading to the litigation. We shall, therefore, confine the discussion to matters pertinent to the compromise.
( 3 ) SUBBAMMA adopted one K. V. Seshaiah. Seshaiah married two wives. Through the first wife he had a son born to him by name Sudarshan Guptha and through the second another son by name Anand Babu. In February 1985, during the pendency of the special leave petition the adoptive mother died. Sudarshan and Anand Babu laid claim to the entire property of Subbamma exclusively to each of them under two different wills said to be by Subbamma and each contended that the other wilt was a forged one. With the death of the adoptive mother, Seshaiah laid claim to the entire property as heir. While each of the parties had taken such stand in the litigations a compromise was brought about on 21/08/1987 between the father and his
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.