SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
NARENDRAKUMAR
versus
DHARAMDUTT
Decide on March 17, 1993
Constitution of India – Article 226 –Delhi Electricity Supplyundertaking (in short desu) claimed higher scales of pay as they were not satisfied with pay-scales recommended by the Third Pay Commission government therefore constituted Shiv Shankar a Committee to go into question of revision of pay-scales of technical staff of DESU – SSC submitted its according to which higher pay-scales were allowed to technical staff of DESU non-technical/ministerial staff of DESU who were not covered by report of SSC demanded that they should also be granted pay-scales as recommended by DESU considered demand of the ministerial staff at its meeting held and decided to revise pay-scales of the non-technical staff also working in DESU – Held, Writ petitioners are the employees of Junior Navyug School run by NDMC employees of school though run by NDMC fall in a different cadre altogether and as such cannot claim benefit of SSC pay-scales on basis of R. D. Gupta judgment is not their case that their posts are interchangeable or transferable from any other post under nature and the duties performed by the petitioners are totally different and they cannot be granted benefit of SSC pay-scales on basis of any equality with other employees of NDMC who have been granted such benefit –Telephone Operators fall in a separate cadre and their posts are neither interchangeable nor transferable with other members of service in NDMC – Petitioners are Trained Telephone Operators and Senior Telephone Operators and as such do not fall within category of ministerial staff and as such are not entitled to benefit of SSC pay-scales on basis of R. D. Gupta case – Appeal dismissed.
Judgment
N. M. KASLIWAL
( 1 ). All these cases are an upshot of the case R. D. Gupta v. Lt.-Governor, Delhi Administration. It is not necessary for us to give the background and history of the constitution of the two main civic bodies namely, New Delhi Municipal Committee (in short ndmc) and the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (in short mcd), in the Union Territory of Del hi as the same has already been mentioned in detail in the above R. D. Gupta case. We would thus mention only such details which are relevant and necessary for the purpose of deciding the above cases. All the above cases relate to the employees of the NDMC who are claiming the benefit of the report of Shiv Shankar Committee (in short ssc) in respect of the grant of pay-scales as allowed to other employees of NDMC in R. D. Gupta case.
( 2 ). The government accepted the report of the Third Pay Commission and granted pay-scales as recommended to the employees of NDMC as well as to the MCD. The technical staff of the Delhi Electricity Supplyundertaking (in short desu) claimed higher scales of pay as they were not satisfied with the pay-scales recommended by the Third Pay Commission. The government therefore constituted Shiv Shankar a Committee to go into the question of revision of pay-scales of the technical staff of DESU. The SSC submitted its report in 1973 according to which higher pay-scales were allowed to the technical staff of DESU. The non-technical/ministerial staff of DESU who were not covered by the report of the SSC demanded that they should also be granted pay-scales as recommended by the SSC. The DESU considered the demand of the ministerial staff at its meeting held in May 1973 and decided to revise the pay-scales of the non-technical staff also working in DESU.
( 3 ). Since the technical as well as the ministerial staff working in the DESU were granted the pay-scales recommended by SSC, the NDMC also by its resolution No. 154 dated 19/10/1973 allowed the benefits of pay-scales as recommended by SSC to its staff working in the electricity wing. In view of the fact that the benefit of the SSC pay-scales was granted by the NDMC to the ministerial staff working in the electricity wing only, the employees working in the general wing of the NDMC also raised a demand for granting them also the benefit of the pay- scales recommended by SSC. Many orders were passed from time to time and writ petitions were also filed by the concerned parties, but we do not think it necessary to give the details as the same have been narrated in R. D. Gupta case and we come to the resolution of the NDMC dated 27/06/1978 constituting the electricity wing with effect from 1/05/1978 or such subsequent date as may be fixed composed of 28 posts of pump drivers, two posts of welders, three posts of carpenters and one post of pump mechanic and 496 posts of ministerial staff and to give all of them scales of pay as per SS Committee Report. Three petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution viz. C. W. Nos. 1231, 557 and 280 of 1978 were filed in the Delhi High court. We are only concerned with the grievance of the ministerial staff who were claiming to be treated on a par with the ministerial staff of the electricity wing in the matter of pay and allowances. The ministerial staff in the general wing having not received the full relief in the High court filed C. A. No. 2969 of 1973 before this court. It was claimed in the said appeal that instead of restricting the payment of SS Committee pay-scales to the 496 ex-cadre posts in the electricity wing and directing the NDMC to fill up those posts on the basis of seniority-cum-option, the High court should have directed the NDMC to give the SS Committee pay-scales to all the members of the ministerial staff. In R. D. Gupta case this court decided many appeals by a common order, but we are only concerned with the C. A. No. 2969 of 1983 which relates to the ministerial staff in the general wing of the NDMC. It was contended by the appella
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.