SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 249

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Mehta General and Provision Store
Vs.
Prem Wati
Decided On : 17/2/1994

Change of business does not necessarily constitute a change of user of premises.

Headnote:

Change of User - Premises - The court set aside the finding that changing the business from a general provision store to a textile store amounted to a change of user of the premises. The judgment of the High court was set aside, and the rent payable for the premises was fixed at Rs. 500.00 per month from 1/4/1994. The court left open the question of eviction on other grounds, including subletting, for appropriate proceedings.

Fact of the Case:

The tenant changed the business from a general provision store to a textile store, leading to a dispute over the change of user of the premises. The High court's judgment was challenged.

Finding of the Court:

The court set aside the High court's judgment and fixed the rent payable for the premises. It left open the question of eviction on other grounds for future proceedings.

Issues: Change of user of premises, rent payable, grounds for eviction including subletting

Ratio Decidendi: The change of business from a general provision store to a textile store did not amount to a change of user of the premises. The court fixed the rent payable and left open the question of eviction on other grounds for future proceedings.

Final Decision: The court set aside the High court's judgment, fixed the rent payable for the premises, and left open the question of eviction on other grounds for future proceedings.

( 1 ) WE are totally unable to accept the finding that merely because the tenant who was running a general provision store had changed his business to one of textile it would amount to change of user of premises. Therefore, we have no hesitation in setting aside the impugned judgment of the High court. Accordingly, the judgment of the High court is set aside. Civil is allowed. No costs. However, in the interest of justice we hereby order that on and from 1/4/1994 the rent payable shall be Rs. 500. 00 per month for the premises in question. We also make it clear that if there are other grounds on which the landlady seeks eviction including the one relating to subletting which is stated to be a subsequent event, on which, we do not have sufficient material, that question is left open to be decided in appropriate proceedings.

( 2 ) WHATEVER amount is deposited in this court will be sent to Mr Santosh Tangri by means of Crossed Bank Draft within one week from today.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top