SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Mehta General and Provision Store
Vs.
Prem Wati
Decided On : 17/2/1994
Change of User - Premises - The court set aside the finding that changing the business from a general provision store to a textile store amounted to a change of user of the premises. The judgment of the High court was set aside, and the rent payable for the premises was fixed at Rs. 500.00 per month from 1/4/1994. The court left open the question of eviction on other grounds, including subletting, for appropriate proceedings.
Fact of the Case:
The tenant changed the business from a general provision store to a textile store, leading to a dispute over the change of user of the premises. The High court's judgment was challenged.
Finding of the Court:
The court set aside the High court's judgment and fixed the rent payable for the premises. It left open the question of eviction on other grounds for future proceedings.
Issues: Change of user of premises, rent payable, grounds for eviction including subletting
Ratio Decidendi: The change of business from a general provision store to a textile store did not amount to a change of user of the premises. The court fixed the rent payable and left open the question of eviction on other grounds for future proceedings.
Final Decision: The court set aside the High court's judgment, fixed the rent payable for the premises, and left open the question of eviction on other grounds for future proceedings.
( 1 ) WE are totally unable to accept the finding that merely because the tenant who was running a general provision store had changed his business to one of textile it would amount to change of user of premises. Therefore, we have no hesitation in setting aside the impugned judgment of the High court. Accordingly, the judgment of the High court is set aside. Civil is allowed. No costs. However, in the interest of justice we hereby order that on and from 1/4/1994 the rent payable shall be Rs. 500. 00 per month for the premises in question. We also make it clear that if there are other grounds on which the landlady seeks eviction including the one relating to subletting which is stated to be a subsequent event, on which, we do not have sufficient material, that question is left open to be decided in appropriate proceedings.
( 2 ) WHATEVER amount is deposited in this court will be sent to Mr Santosh Tangri by means of Crossed Bank Draft within one week from today.
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.