SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 838

S.B.MAJMUDAR, S.P.BHARUCHA, FAIZAN UDDIN
Principal, Cambridge School – Appellant
Versus
Payalgupta – Respondent


Advocates:
BHIMRAO N.NAIK, M.P.Jha, S.R.Bhatt

Judgment

FAIZAN UDDIN

( 1 ) ACCORDING to the appellants, the Central Board of Secondary Education introduced 10+2 scheme of education in the year 1977 providing general education up to the level of 10+2 class, visualising two distinct stages one up to class X and the other up to class XII so that the students with certain competence should alone pursue education beyond class X. The appellant, Cambridge School, New Delhi, with a view to achieve the aforesaid objective and to upgradge the academic standard of each student through special programme prescribed a cut off level of 50 percent marks for admission to class XI of the said school. Consequently, the principal-appellant addressed a circular dated 4-10-1993 to the parents of the students stating that the admission to class X would not be automatic but a cut off level was prescribed by the Cambridge School to the effect that a student of class X must obtain 50 percent marks in aggregate in the Board examination for being granted readmission in class XI. In other words it would be a fresh admission even for those students who passed class X from the Cambridge School itself obtaining minimum marks of 50 per cent in aggregate as quali















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top