B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, M.N.VENKATACHALIAH
Subhash Photographics – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
Judgment
B. P. JEEVAN REDDY, JJ.
( 1 ) LEAVE granted. Heard counsel for the parties.
( 2 ) THESE appeals arise from the common judgment and order of the Bombay High court in a batch of writ petitions. The question is whether the photographic machinery imported by the appellants falls under Customs Tariff Heading No. 98. 01. If it falls under it, it is entitled to a concessional rate of duty. If not, it is chargeable to a higher duty.
( 3 ) THE Customs Tariff Act, 1975 was enacted by Parliament with a view to consolidate and amend the law relating to customs duties. It repealed the Indian Tariff Act, 1934 and Indian Tariff (Amendment) Act, 1949. Section 2 says that the rates at which duties and customs shall be levied under the Customs Act, 1962 are those specified in the First and Second Schedules. Section 3 levies additional duty equal to excise duty. Ch. 98 was introduced in the Schedule with effect from 28/02/1986. It relates to "project Imports; Laboratory Chemicals; Passengers Baggage, Personal Importation by air or post; Ship Stores". Ch. 98 provides a concessional rate of duty in respect of articles and items specified therein. Ch. Note (1 declares, "this Ch. is to be taken to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.