SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(SC) 116

G.L.OZA, M.M.DUTT
Tarsem Lal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates:
C.M.Sharma, C.V.SUBBA RAO, H.K.PURI, HARBANS LAL BAJAJ, I.M.SHROFF, M.R.SHARMA

Judgment

OZA

( 1 ) THIS appeal has been filed by the appellant after the grant of special leave by this Court against his conviction under S. 5 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act and sentence to rigorous imprisonment for 2 years and fine of Rs. 150. 00 and also under S. 161 of the Indian Penal Code and rigorous imprisonment for one year and a fine of Rs. 100. 00 awarded by Special Judge, Ambala. and maintained by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana by its judgment dated 23-12-1977.

( 2 ) ACCORDING to the prosecution. . Shri M. G. Devasahayara Prosecution witness 4 Sub-Divisional Officer, Jagadhri had sent a complaint against the appellant to the Station House Officer, Jagadhri on 7-6-1972 on the basis of which the first information report was recorded at Police Station about 4 P. M. on 7-6-1972. The Sub-Divisional Officer has received an application from one Gian Singh complainant about the conduct of the appellant. It was alleged by Gian Singh Prosecution witness 2 in the complaint that the appellant who was a Patwari of Bambhol Circle, had been demanding money for supply of copies from the revenue record and Gian Singh needed those copies in connection with the execution of a





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top