SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(SC) 338

O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY, R.S.PATHAK, V.R.KRISHNA IYER
Sohan Lal – Appellant
Versus
Asha Ram – Respondent


Judgment

Krishna lyer, J.

( 1 ) THIS election appeal would have invited adjudicatoin of the issue raised by the appllant bul for the fact that the U. P. Legislasive assembly has since been dissolved, fresh elections having taken place and a fresh House having come into existence with newly elected representatives. Perhaps Shri Lekhis client has a substantial grievance. It is also possible that the decision of the court below was wrong but we are not inclined to investigate the question at all and, therefore, do not propose to hear either shri Lekhi or Shri Yogeshwar Prasad. The subsequent events we have adverted to have rendered this litigation so wholly unreal that it will be a waste of this courts time to consider the issues. For this reason we dispose of this appeal without adjudication. The same fate will be shared by the cross appeal. Partics will bear their own costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top