SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 405

S.H.KAPADIA, ARIJIT PASAYAT
Marwar Gramin Bank – Appellant
Versus
Ram Pal Chouhan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Arijit Pasayat, J.—Leave granted.

2. Challenge in this appeal is to the correctness of the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of the Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur allowing the D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No. 617 of 2003 filed by the respondent. By the impugned order the High Court held as follows :

“In view of the aforesaid discussion, we are of the view that the impugned order of termination dated 8th August, 1995 suffers from the procedural error leading to the manifest injustice or the vice of violation of principles of natural justice.

Consequently, special appeal is allowed. The order of the leaned Single Judge dated 22nd July, 2003 is set aside. The writ petition is allowed. The order of the Disciplinary Authority dated 3rd August, 1995 - Annexure - 1 and the order of the Appellate Authority dated 28.12.1995 - Annexure - 2 are quashed and set aside. It is directed that the appellant shall be reinstated in service with all consequential benefits.”

3. On 27.9.2004 notice was issued by this Court limited to sustainability of High Court’s judgment vis-a-vis charge Nos. 6 and 7.

4. A brief reference to the factual aspects would suffice.

5. The respondent was dismissed fr























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top