SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 509

Umrao – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S.B. Sinha, J.—The appellant before us in Criminal Appeal No. 1387/99 is the first informant of First Information Report (FIR) No. 386 lodged on 17.9.1992 at Narnaul Police Station in Tehsil Narnaul in relation to an occurrence which took place at about 6/6.30 A.M. on that day wherein the respondent Nos. 2 to 6 in Criminal Appeal No.1387/99, respondents in Criminal Appeal No. 1388/99, along with one Ram Dayal, were arrayed as accused for alleged commission of an offence punishable under Sections 148, 302/149, 307/149. 325/149 and 506/149 of the Indian Penal Code (‘I.P.C.’ for short). In the said FIR, it was alleged by the appellant herein. Umrao, that at the said hour, i.e. 6/6.30 A.M. he went to the tubewell owned by his brother Rewti, along with his son-Rajinder and his brother. They found that the accused persons were removing the electric motor therefrom. On their asking the accused persons not to do so. Yad Ram hurled a blow by the reverse side of “kassi”, which he was carrying in his hand, on the head of Rajinder (since deceased). Rajinder is son of the appellant. He further hurled a blow with the said “kassi” on the head of the deceased, who fell down. The accused-re




























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top