Umrao – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
S.B. Sinha, J.—The appellant before us in Criminal Appeal No. 1387/99 is the first informant of First Information Report (FIR) No. 386 lodged on 17.9.1992 at Narnaul Police Station in Tehsil Narnaul in relation to an occurrence which took place at about 6/6.30 A.M. on that day wherein the respondent Nos. 2 to 6 in Criminal Appeal No.1387/99, respondents in Criminal Appeal No. 1388/99, along with one Ram Dayal, were arrayed as accused for alleged commission of an offence punishable under Sections 148, 302/149, 307/149. 325/149 and 506/149 of the Indian Penal Code (‘I.P.C.’ for short). In the said FIR, it was alleged by the appellant herein. Umrao, that at the said hour, i.e. 6/6.30 A.M. he went to the tubewell owned by his brother Rewti, along with his son-Rajinder and his brother. They found that the accused persons were removing the electric motor therefrom. On their asking the accused persons not to do so. Yad Ram hurled a blow by the reverse side of “kassi”, which he was carrying in his hand, on the head of Rajinder (since deceased). Rajinder is son of the appellant. He further hurled a blow with the said “kassi” on the head of the deceased, who fell down. The accused-re
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.