SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 429

S.B.SINHA, TARUN CHATTERJEE, P.K.BALASUBRAMANYAN
Achal Mishra – Appellant
Versus
Rama Shankar Singh – Respondent


ORDER

P.K. Balasubramanyan, J.—This application is filed by the respondents in the above appeal praying for a clarification of the order dated 11.4.2005. It is prayed that the order be clarified as regards the amount to be paid towards arrears of rent after taking note of the sums earlier paid by them. This Court, in the Judgment, had directed Respondent no. 1 to pay a sum of Rs. 3,50,000/- and Respondent no. 2 to pay a sum of Rs. 3,00,000/- as a condition for enabling them to pursue their writ petition in the High Court. This was taking note of the fact that for a period of 26 years or so, no rent had been tendered or paid by these respondents towards the portions of the building occupied by them on the basis of allotments by the rent controller. It is the case of the respondents in the appeal, the petitioners herein, that during the pendency of the appeal in this Court, they had made some payments and it was just and necessary to permit the deduction of those sums paid from the amounts ordered to be deposited. Respondent no. 1 submits that he had paid a sum of Rs. 1,75,032/- and hence the balance amount payable by him is only Rs. 1,74,968/- and there may be such a clarification. R




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top