S.B.SINHA, P.P.NAOLEKAR
Budh Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
S.B. Sinha, J.—The Appellants have preferred this appeal being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the judgment and order dated 1.9.1999 passed by the High Court of Allahabad in Criminal Appeal No. 2079/93, whereby and whereunder the judgment and order dated 13.8.1993 passed by the IVth Additional Sessions Judge, Moradabad in S.T.No. 604/2002 acquitting the Appellants herein for commission of offences under Sections 148, 302 and 307/149 of the Indian Penal Code (‘IPC’, for short) and under Section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 was reversed convicting them under Sections 148, 307/149 and 302/149 of the Indian Penal Code for intentionally causing death of one Ram Gopal (deceased) and his wife Chatarvati, as also for attempt to commit murder of their son Rajveer Singh (the first informant).
2. Appellant No.1-Budh Singh, Appellant No. 2-Prem Singh and Appellant No. 3-Jagan Singh are real brothers. The Appellant No. 4-Mahesh Singh is son of Budh Singh, whereas Appellant No.6-Rajender Singh is son of Prem Singh. Appellant No.5-Ram Raj is not related to other Appellants, but he is stated to be belonging to the group of the other appellants. The deceased Ram Gopal owned agricultural land
Thanedar Singh v. State of M.P
Rajesh @ Raju Chandulal Gandhi & Anr. v. State of Gujarat
Bijoy Singh & Anr. v. State of Bihar
Rajeevan & Anr. v. State of Kerala
Narendra Singh & Anr. v. State of M.P.
Shambhoo Missir & Anr. v. State of Bihar
Ranjitsing Brahmajeetsing Sharma v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.