SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 503

S.B.SINHA, P.P.NAOLEKAR
Budh Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S.B. Sinha, J.—The Appellants have preferred this appeal being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the judgment and order dated 1.9.1999 passed by the High Court of Allahabad in Criminal Appeal No. 2079/93, whereby and whereunder the judgment and order dated 13.8.1993 passed by the IVth Additional Sessions Judge, Moradabad in S.T.No. 604/2002 acquitting the Appellants herein for commission of offences under Sections 148, 302 and 307/149 of the Indian Penal Code (‘IPC’, for short) and under Section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 was reversed convicting them under Sections 148, 307/149 and 302/149 of the Indian Penal Code for intentionally causing death of one Ram Gopal (deceased) and his wife Chatarvati, as also for attempt to commit murder of their son Rajveer Singh (the first informant).

2. Appellant No.1-Budh Singh, Appellant No. 2-Prem Singh and Appellant No. 3-Jagan Singh are real brothers. The Appellant No. 4-Mahesh Singh is son of Budh Singh, whereas Appellant No.6-Rajender Singh is son of Prem Singh. Appellant No.5-Ram Raj is not related to other Appellants, but he is stated to be belonging to the group of the other appellants. The deceased Ram Gopal owned agricultural land















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top