SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 518

A.R.LAKSHMANAN, LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA
National Board of Examinations – Appellant
Versus
G. Anand Ramamurthy – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Dr. AR. Lakshmanan, J.—By consent of parties the special leave petition itself is taken up for final hearing.

2. This special leave petition is directed against the final judgment and order of the High Court of Delhi on 27.4.2006 passed in LPA No. 661 of 2006, which was in turn directed against the judgment of the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Delhi dated 21.4.2006 passed in W.P. (C) No. 5565-66 of 2006, whereby the writ petition filed by the respondents was allowed.

3. We have heard Mr. Gopal Subramanium, learned Addl. Solicitor General for the petitioner and Mr. S. Bala Krishnan, learned Senior Advocate for the respondents. The matter was argued at length.

4. We have perused the Bulletin of Information issued by the National Board of Examinations and also the Bulletin of Information cum Application Form for Diplomate of National Board (Final Examination). Centralised Entrace Test for the relevant post. Our attention was also drawn to Rule 7.12, which deals with eligibility for appearing in super specialities, and reads thus :

“7.12 Eligibility for appearing in Super Specialities :

**Medical Super Specialities and Surgical Super Specialities (refer Para 1.2)

(i)Candi














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top