SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 531

A.R.LAKSHMANAN, LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA
Harsh Vardhan Bansal – Appellant
Versus
Chandigarh Housing Board – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Dr. A.R. Lakshmanan, J.—Heard Ms. Prashanthi Prasad, learned counsel for the appellant and Mrs. Rachana Joshi Issar, learned counsel for the respondent Board.

2. This appeal is directed against the order passed by the High Court dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant herein on the ground of concealment of facts. The appellant applied for allotment of an H.I.G. (Ind.) flat. Under the Scheme, a person would be eligible for allotment of a dwelling unit in case he/she or his wife/her husband or any of his/her dependent relations including unmarried children does not own on free hold or lease-hold or on hire-purchase basis a residential plot/house in the Union Territory of Chandigarh or in either of the Urban Estates of Mohali and Panchukula. Similarly, in case he/she has acquired a house/residential site anywhere in India through Govt./semi government/Municipal. Committee/Corporation/Improvement Trust at concessional rates, i.e. at reserved/fixed price, in his/her name or in the names of dependent members of his/her family, he/she will not be eligible for allotment of a dwelling unit.

3. A complaint was received by the respondent-Housing Board that the appellant was







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top