2005 Supreme(SC) 888
RUMA PAL, A.R.LAKSHMANAN
BABULAL – Appellant
Versus
MUNICIPAL CORPN. , RATLAMS – Respondent
ORDER
1. LEAVE GRANTED.
2. THE HIGH COURT APPEARS TO HAVE PROCEEDED ON THE BASIS THAT IT WAS SETTLED LAW THAT A PERSON NOT A PARTY TO THE ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS CANNOT BE PROCEEDED AGAINST IN CONTEMPT. THE ISSUE IS A DEBATABLE ONE, PARTICULARLY HAVING REGARD TO THE LAW ON THE ISSUE PARTICULARLY IN S.N. BANERJEE V. KUCHWAR LIME AND STONE CO. LTD.1 THE ORDER OF THE HIGH COURT IS SET ASIDE AND THE MATTER IS REMANDED BACK FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE ISSUE.
3. THE APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF ACCORDINGLY.
Click Here to Read the rest of this document