SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 888

RUMA PAL, A.R.LAKSHMANAN
BABULAL – Appellant
Versus
MUNICIPAL CORPN. , RATLAMS – Respondent


ORDER

1. LEAVE GRANTED.

2. THE HIGH COURT APPEARS TO HAVE PROCEEDED ON THE BASIS THAT IT WAS SETTLED LAW THAT A PERSON NOT A PARTY TO THE ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS CANNOT BE PROCEEDED AGAINST IN CONTEMPT. THE ISSUE IS A DEBATABLE ONE, PARTICULARLY HAVING REGARD TO THE LAW ON THE ISSUE PARTICULARLY IN S.N. BANERJEE V. KUCHWAR LIME AND STONE CO. LTD.1 THE ORDER OF THE HIGH COURT IS SET ASIDE AND THE MATTER IS REMANDED BACK FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE ISSUE.

3. THE APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF ACCORDINGLY.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top