SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 1222

S.B.SINHA, R.V.RAVEENDRAN
VAIJAYANTI – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


ORDER

1. THE APPELLANT, A LADY, HAS BEEN CONVICTED FOR ALLEGED COMMISSION OF AN OFFENCE UNDER SECTION 302 READ WITH SECTION 34 OF THE INDIAN PENAL CODE.

2. ZUBEDABI, THE COMPLAINANT HAD FOUR SONS, AJMAT ALI, ASGAR ALI (DECEASED), BAFAT ALI AND GULLU. THE COMPLAINANT, ALONG WITH HER HUSBAND AND TWO SONS, NAMELY, BAFAT ALI AND GULLU USED TO LIVE AT MURTIZAPUR, WHEREAS HER OTHER TWO SONS AJMAT ALI AND ASGAR ALI USED TO LIVE AT AKOLA. ON THE FATEFUL DAY, NAMELY, ON 10-6-1998, THE APPELLANT HEREIN, ALLEGEDLY ACCOMPANIED BY OTHER ACCUSED PERSONS MANIK AND HER BROTHER RAJU, WENT TO THE HOUSE OF THE COMPLAINANT AND INQUIRED ABOUT THE WHEREABOUTS OF GULLU AND UPON INQUIRY MADE IN THAT BEHALF AS TO WHY SHE HAD BEEN ASKING SO, IT WAS TOLD THAT GULLU HAD OUTRAGED THE MODESTY OF CHITRAS (APPELLANTS SISTER) DAUGHTER MANGLA. ON THE SAME DAY AT 5.00 P.M. ASGAR ALI AND HIS WIFE SHAHNOORBI, BAFAT ALI AND HIS IN-LAWS REACHED AND MET ZUBEDABI. THEY TOLD HER THAT THEY HAD COME TO ASGAR ALI TO MAKE PEACE. AT ABOUT 7.00 P.M. WHEN OTHER PERSONS WERE SITTING IN FRONT OF THE HOUSE, ASGAR ALI WENT TO A SHOP FOR PURCHASING BEEDIS. HIS WIFE FOLLOWED HIM, WHO IN TURN, WAS FOLLOWED BY ZUBEDABI. AS ASGAR ALI CROSSE








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top