SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 1025

ASHOK BHAN, S.B.SINHA
RAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARDS – Appellant
Versus
KRISHNA – Respondent


ORDER

1. THESE TWO APPEALS HAVE BEEN FILED AGAINST A COMMON ORDER PASSED BY THE MONOPOLIES AND RESTRICTIVE TRADE PRACTICES COMMISSION (FOR SHORT "THE COMMISSION") IN RTPES NOS. 135 AND 130 OF 1994 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 10(A)(I) READ WITH SECTION 37 OF THE MONOPOLIES AND RESTRICTIVE TRADE PRACTICES ACT, 1969 (FOR SHORT "THE ACT") ALONG WITH AN APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY INJUNCTION UNDER SECTION 12-A OF THE ACT WHEREIN THE COMMISSION WHILE DISMISSING THE COMPLAINTS FILED BY THE RESPONDENT DIRECTED THAT THE RESPONDENT SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO PAY INTEREST ON THE AMOUNT DUE DURING THE PERIOD OF STAY GRANTED BY THE COMMISSION.

THE FACTS ARE TAKEN FROM CA NO. 4656 OF 1998

2. THE RESPONDENT PURCHASED BOOKLET NO. 65240 (BEING A PROPOSAL/INVITATION) ALONG WITH AN APPLICATION FORM FOR REGISTRATION FOR THE PURCHASE OF A HOUSE UNDER THE MEDIUM INCOME GROUP B. THE ESTIMATED COST OF THE HOUSE WAS TO BE RUPEES FIFTY THOUSAND ONLY. THE APPELLANTS ALLOTTED HOUSE NO. 17E/746 SITUATED IN CHOPASANI, JODHPUR, SINCE THE CONSIDERATION OF THE HOUSE WAS TO BE FIXED ON THE DATE OF ALLOTMENT, AFTER ADJUSTMENT OF RUPEES THIRTY-FIVE THOUSAND ALREADY PAID BY THE RESPONDENT, THE APPELLANTS VIDE THEIR L

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top