SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 1237

ASHOK BHAN, ALTAMAS KABIR
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
P. N. NATARAJANS – Respondent


ORDER

1. IN SPITE OF THREE LETTERS WRITTEN BY THE REGISTRY DATED 16-10-2004, 6-112004 AND 24-12-2004, THE APPELLANT(S) DID NOT FURNISH THE LATEST AND COMPLETE ADDRESSES OF RESPONDENTS 3 AND 10 VIZ. SHRI K. SADANANDAN, S/O KARUPPAN FCI, RETD. AM(D), KOLLAM AND THE BRANCH MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA,

MANKAVU BRANCH, CALICUT, KERALA (RESPONDENT 1 IN CIVIL APPEAL NO. 239 OF 2004 AND RESPONDENT 4 IN CIVIL APPEAL NO. 243 OF 2004). COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANTS SEEKS ONE MORE OPPORTUNITY TO DO SO, WHICH IS DECLINED.

2. ACCORDINGLY, THE APPEALS AGAINST RESPONDENTS 3 AND 10 (RESPONDENT 1 IN CIVIL APPEAL NO. 239 OF 2004 AND RESPONDENT 4 IN CIVIL APPEAL NO. 243 OF 2004) ARE DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top