Y.K.SABHARWAL, S.H.KAPADIA, C.K.THAKKER
VIJAY JAIMNI – Appellant
Versus
MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIAS – Respondent
ORDER
1. THE PETITIONER PARTICIPATED IN THE COMMON ENTRANCE TEST CALLED ASSOCET 2004 HELD ON 30-5-2004 FOR ADMISSION TO MBBS COURSE TO THE COLLEGES MAINTAINED BY RESPONDENT 2 ASSOCIATION. HE OBTAINED 134 MARKS IN THE SAID TEST. HE APPLIED FOR ADMISSION TO A FEW COLLEGES INCLUDING NDMVP SAMAJS MEDICAL COLLEGE, RESPONDENT 5 HEREIN, FOR ADMISSION OUT OF "OUTSIDE MAHARASHTRA QUOTA CATEGORY". THE APPLICATION OF THE PETITIONER WAS ALSO FORWARDED TO RESPONDENT 5 BY RESPONDENT 4 SAMITI/COMMITTEE, IN TERMS OF THE LETTER DATED 23-9-2004. IT IS NOT IN DISPUTE THAT THE PETITIONERS APPLICATION WAS RECEIVED BY RESPONDENT 5 COLLEGE ON 24-9-2004. ACCORDING TO THE PETITIONER, HE HAD, IN FACT, SENT THE APPLICATION BY SPEED POST THROUGH THE POST OFFICE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF POSTS ON 23-8-2004. ACCORDING TO THE REPORT OF THE POST OFFICE, ON RESPONDENT 5 REFUSING TO TAKE THE DELIVERY, THE POSTAL ARTICLE WAS SENT BACK. IT IS THEREAFTER THAT THE PETITIONERS APPLICATION WAS SENT TO RESPONDENT 5 THROUGH RESPONDENT 4. COMMITTEE/SAMITI WHICH WAS APPROACHED BY THE PETITIONER. THE STAND OF RESPONDENT 5 IS THAT IT IS MAKING ENQUIRIES FROM THE POSTAL AUTHORITIES. WE ARE SURPRISED AT THIS STAND TAKEN BY RESPONDENT
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.