SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 1051

Y.K.SABHARWAL, C.K.THAKKER
MANISH UJWALS – Appellant
Versus
MAHARISHI DAYANAND SARASWATI UNIVERSITYS – Respondent


ORDER

1. HEARD THE LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE PARTIES.

2. LEAVE GRANTED.

3. CHALLENGE, BEFORE US, IS TO THE CORRECTNESS OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT OF THE HIGH COURT WHEREBY THE DECISION OF THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE WAS AFFIRMED BY THE DIVISION BENCH ON COMING TO THE CONCLUSION THAT IT CANNOT BE SAID WITH CERTAINTY THAT THE ANSWERS TO THE SIX QUESTIONS GIVEN IN THE ANSWER KEYS WERE ERRONEOUS AND INCORRECT.

4. BRIEFLY, THE FACTS ARE THAT THE STUDENT COMMUNITY FILED A WRIT PETITION BEFORE THE HIGH COURT CHALLENGING THEIR RANKING IN THE ENTRANCE TESTS, WHICH WERE CONDUCTED BY RESPONDENT 1 MAHARISHI DAYANAND SARASWATI UNIVERSITY (FOR SHORT "THE UNIVERSITY") ON 9-5-2005, 10-5-2005 AND 11-5-2005, FOR ADMISSION TO MEDICAL AND DENTAL COURSES IN VARIOUS COLLEGES IN THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN. THE GRIEVANCE OF THE STUDENTS WAS THAT VARIOUS KEY ANSWERS ON THE BASIS WHEREOF THE ANSWER-SHEETS WERE EVALUATED WERE WRONG AND, CONSEQUENTLY, WRONG AND ERRONEOUS RANKING WAS PREPARED.

5. ON THE AFORESAID THREE DATES, EXAMINATIONS WERE HELD FOR PHYSICS, CHEMISTRY AND BIOLOGY SUBJECTS RESPECTIVELY. THE RESULTS WERE DECLARED ON 22-5-2005 ON INTERNET AND PUBLISHED IN THE NEWSPAPERS ON 23-5-2005. THE TOTAL MARKS ALLOTTED
















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top