SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 1077

Y.K.SABHARWAL, B.N.SRIKRISHNA, P.P.NAOLEKAR
GURU NANAK DEV UNIVERSITY – Appellant
Versus
SAUMIL GARGS – Respondent


ORDER

1. LEAVE GRANTED.

2. IT IS A VERY UNFORTUNATE LITIGATION WHERE STUDENTS COMPETING TO GET ADMISSION IN MEDICAL AND OTHER PROFESSIONAL COURSES HAVE TO LITIGATE AMONGST THEMSELVES. NONE OF THE STUDENTS CAN, HOWEVER, BE BLAMED FOR THE LITIGATION COMMENCED IN THE HIGH COURT AND WHICH HAS COME UP TO THIS COURT BY WAY OF THE PRESENT PETITIONS AS ALSO THE EARLIER PETITIONS FILED BY GURU NANAK DEV UNIVERSITY (FOR SHORT "THE APPELLANT UNIVERSITY") CHALLENGING THE INTERIM ORDERS THAT HAD BEEN PASSED BY THE HIGH COURT. IF ANYONE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PRESENT STATE OF AFFAIRS, IT IS THE APPELLANT UNIVERSITY ALONE.

3. THE PUNJAB MEDICAL ENTRANCE TEST WAS CONDUCTED BY THE APPELLANT UNIVERSITY ON 30-6-2005. ABOUT 10,000 STUDENTS APPEARED IN THE SAID TEST. THE RESULTS WERE DECLARED ON 2-7-2005. THERE WERE 200 QUESTIONS IN THE OBJECTIVE FORM - 50 EACH FOR PHYSICS, CHEMISTRY, BOTANY AND ZOOLOGY. THERE WERE MULTI-CHOICE ANSWERS; FOUR OPTIONS WERE AVAILABLE TO THE STUDENTS. THEY HAD TO OPT FOR ONE CORRECT ANSWER FROM A TO D.

4. AFTER DECLARATION OF THE RESULTS, WRIT PETITION WAS FILED BY SOME OF THE STUDENTS, INTER ALIA, ALLEGING THAT THE KEY ANSWERS TO 21 QUESTIONS WERE INCORRECT. THE HIGH COURT AP





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top