SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 828

RUMA PAL, ARUN KUMAR
ISLAMIC ACADEMY OF EDUCATION – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent


ORDER

1. THE APPLICANTS HAVE SOUGHT CLARIFICATION OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 14-8-2003 PASSED IN ISLAMIC ACADEMY OF EDUCATION V. STATE OF KARNATAKA.1 THE CLARIFICATION WHICH HAS BEEN SOUGHT IN THIS APPLICATION PERTAINS TO THE RIGHT OF THE MANAGEMENT OF PRIVATE UNAIDED COLLEGES TO ADMIT NRI/FOREIGN STUDENTS UP TO 15% OF THE SEATS RESERVED FOR THE MANAGEMENT QUOTA AND TO ALLOW THEM TO HAVE A SEPARATE SYSTEM OF JUDGING THE MERIT OF SUCH STUDENTS AND TO HAVE FEES FIXED AS FAR AS THE STUDENTS WERE CONCERNED.

2. THE STATE, RESPONDENTS HAVE OPPOSED THE APPLICATION ON THE GROUND THAT THE COMMITTEE WHICH WAS SET UP PURSUANT TO THE DECISION OF THIS COURT IN ISLAMIC ACADEMY OF EDUCATION 1 HAD NOT BEEN MADE PARTY TO THESE PROCEEDINGS. IT IS FURTHER SUBMITTED THAT ANY ORDER ON THIS APPLICATION MIGHT INVOLVE A MODIFICATION OF THE DECISION OF THE FIVE-JUDGE BENCH AND THIS COURT SHOULD NOT THEREFORE ENTERTAIN THE APPLICATION. THE THIRD SUBMISSION IS THAT SINCE THE MAIN APPLICATION HAD BEEN DISPOSED OF ON 18-12-2003, THERE WAS NO SCOPE OF FILING ANY INTERIM APPLICATION AT THIS STAGE. RELIANCE HAS ALSO BEEN PLACED ON THE DECISION OF THIS COURT IN STATE OF U.P. V. BRAHM DATT SHARMA2, SCC PARA 10.

3. LEARN






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top