SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 1320

Y.K.SABHARWAL, D.M.DHARMADHIKARI
State of A. P. – Appellant
Versus
FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA – Respondent


ORDER

1. THE FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA, HYDERABAD, IS THE RESPONDENT IN THESE PETITIONS. THE DISPUTE RELATES TO ASSESSMENT YEARS 1972-73 AND 1973-74 UNDER THE CENTRAL SALES TAX ACT. THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT OF THE HIGH COURT IS DATED 24-6-1996 IN SLP (C) NO. CC NO. 9362 OF 2004 AND DATED 25-6-1996 IN SLP (C) NO. CC NO. 9529 OF 2004. THE PRESENT PETITIONS WERE FILED ON 26-8-2004 AND 1-9-2004 WITH DELAY OF 2634 AND 2900 DAYS RESPECTIVELY. THE ONLY EXPLANATION GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER STATE OF A.P. IS THAT:

"THE DEPARTMENT EXAMINED THE MATTER AT DIFFERENT HIGHER LEVELS AND A FINAL DECISION TO FILE THE SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION BEFORE THIS HONBLE COURT WAS TAKEN AND THE PAPERS WERE SENT TO THE SPECIAL OFFICER, OFFICE OF THE ADVOCATE-ON-RECORD ON 29-5-2004 AND THE SAME WERE RECEIVED ON 10-6-2004."

WE ARE SHOCKED AS TO THE MANNER IN WHICH THE STATE GOVERNMENT IS FILING PETITIONS IN THIS COURT RESULTING NOT ONLY IN WASTING THE TIME OF THIS COURT AND ALL OTHERS CONCERNED BUT IN TOTAL WASTE OF PUBLIC MONEY. THE IMPUGNED ORDERS HAVE BEEN CHALLENGED AFTER MORE THAN EIGHT YEARS WITH ALMOST NO EXPLANATION, AS IS EVIDENT FROM THE PARAGRAPH REPRODUCED ABOVE.

2. IN THIS VIEW, WHILE DISMISSING THE APPLICA




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top