SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 1132

Y.K.SABHARWAL, D.M.DHARMADHIKARI, TARUN CHATTERJEE
VILE PARLE KELVANI MANDAL, T. K. DENTAL COLLEGE & RESEARCH CENTRE – Appellant
Versus
State Of MaharashtraS, SHIKSHAN SHULKA SAMITI – Respondent


ORDER

1. THE MANAGEMENTS OF VARIOUS PROFESSIONAL (MEDICAL AND DENTAL) COLLEGES IN THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, AGGRIEVED BY THE DETERMINATION OF FEE BY THE COMMITTEE CONSTITUTED UNDER THE CHAIRMANSHIP OF JUSTICE R.A. JAGIRDAR, FILED A NUMBER OF PETITIONS BEFORE THE BOMBAY HIGH COURT. BY THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT DATED 17-8-2004, THE HIGH COURT HAS REQUESTED THE COMMITTEE TO CONSIDER THE OBJECTIONS OF THE MANAGEMENTS AND RENDER ITS DECISION EXPEDITIOUSLY, AT ANY RATE, WITHIN A PERIOD OF THREE MONTHS. WE HAVE NO DOUBT THAT THE COMMITTEE, IN TERMS OF THE DIRECTIONS OF THE HIGH COURT, WOULD RENDER ITS DECISION ON OR BEFORE 17-11-2004.

2. REGARDING THE FEE TO BE CHARGED FROM THE STUDENTS WHO ARE GRANTED ADMISSION OR ARE TO BE GRANTED ADMISSION, THE HIGH COURT DIRECTED THAT THE MANAGEMENTS SHALL CHARGE FEE AS ALLOWED BY THE COMMITTEE, WHICH WOULD BE INTERIM, AND ABIDE BY THE FINAL DECISION OF THE COMMITTEE TO BE GIVEN UPON HEARING THE OBJECTIONS OF THE COLLEGES CONCERNED.

3. VARIOUS MANAGEMENTS HAVE ALSO FILED PETITIONS UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION WHICH ARE ALSO LISTED BEFORE US.

4. WE ARE OF THE VIEW THAT THESE SPECIAL LEAVE PETITIONS AND WRIT PETITIONS SHALL BE LISTED AFTER THE DISPO







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top