RAJESH KUMAR, ARUN KUMAR
HINDUSTAN LEVER LTD. – Appellant
Versus
FOOD INSPECTOR – Respondent
ORDER
1. LEAVE GRANTED.
2. HEARD THE LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE PARTIES.
3. THE APPELLANT HAS FILED THIS APPEAL, BY SPECIAL LEAVE, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT OF THE KERALA HIGH COURT REJECTING PETITIONS FILED BY THE APPELLANTS 9 FOR QUASHING THE PROCEEDINGS IN ST NO. 2412 OF 1999, PENDING IN THE COURT OF THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, FIRST CLASS, ALWAYE.
4. THE PROCEEDINGS, IT APPEARS, WERE INITIATED ON THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE FOOD INSPECTOR, EDAPALLY CIRCLE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, UNDER SECTIONS 2(I-A)(A) AND (M), 7(1) AND 16(1)(A)(I) AND SECTION 17(1) OF THE PREVENTION OF FOOD ADULTERATION ACT, 1954 READ WITH RULE 5 OF THE PREVENTION OF FOOD ADULTERATION RULES. THE FACTS WHICH GIVE RISE TO THIS CASE ARE THAT ON 18-12-1998, SAMPLES WERE COLLECTED FROM A GROCERY SHOP "A.K. STORES" IN THRIKKAKARA PANCHAYAT. AFTER ISSUING FORM VI AND GOING THROUGH THE FORMALITIES, TWO PACKETS WHICH HAVE BEEN DESCRIBED IN THE MAHAZAR AS THAT OF A SKIMMED MILK POWDER (MILKANA) WERE PROCURED BY THE FOOD INSPECTOR FOR ANALYSIS. THE RECOVERY MEMO FURTHER INDICATES THE DESCRIPTION OF THE ARTICLES AS PER DECLARATION ON THE PACKING AS "MILKANA ANIK INSTANT DAIRY WHITENER: INGREDIENTS: PARTLY SKIMMED MILK POWDER, SUCROSE A
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.