S.N.VARIAVA, D.M.DHARMADHIKARI
STATE BY CBI – Appellant
Versus
DILBAGH – Respondent
ORDER
1. THIS APPEAL IS FILED AGAINST THE JUDGMENT OF THE DELHI HIGH COURT DATED 9-3-2001. BRIEFLY STATED, THE FACTS ARE AS FOLLOWS:
ON 21-5-1993 SECRET INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED IN THE OFFICE OF SP/CBVSIU, XI, NEW DELHI THAT THE RESPONDENT IN CONNIVANCE WITH OTHERS WAS INDULGING IN THE ACTIVITY OF SUPPLYING AND SELLING HUGE QUANTITY OF CHARAS TO A NUMBER OF PERSONS IN NAJAFGARH AREA AND IN HARYANA ALSO. THE INFORMATION WAS THAT HE WAS LIKELY TO SUPPLY A HUGE QUANTITY TO AN UNKNOWN PARTY ON 22-5-1993 AT 3 P.M. NEAR DHANSA BUS-STAND, NAJAFGARH, NEW DELHI. THIS INFORMATION WAS REGISTERED IN THE OFFICE OF CBI AND THE CASE WAS ENTRUSTED TO THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MEHAR SINGH.
2. ON 22-5-1993 THE SECRET INFORMER AGAIN CONTACTED THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE AND CONFIRMED THE INFORMATION. ACCORDINGLY, THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE MEHAR SINGH DISCUSSED THE MATTER WITH THE SP AND A RAIDING PARTY WAS ORGANISED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF MEHAR SINGH WHICH CONSISTED OF THE FOLLOWING PERSONS:
MR. DILBAGH SINGH, MR. PHOOL KUMAR, MR. JAGDISH CHAND, MR. JAIBIR SINGH,
MR. RAJINDER SAXENA, AND MR. AJAY SINGH.
3. THE RAIDING PARTY REACHED THE SPOT AT ABOUT 2 P.M. AFTER PARKING
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.