SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 57

S.N.VARIAVA, D.M.DHARMADHIKARI
STATE BY CBI – Appellant
Versus
DILBAGH – Respondent


ORDER

1. THIS APPEAL IS FILED AGAINST THE JUDGMENT OF THE DELHI HIGH COURT DATED 9-3-2001. BRIEFLY STATED, THE FACTS ARE AS FOLLOWS:

ON 21-5-1993 SECRET INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED IN THE OFFICE OF SP/CBVSIU, XI, NEW DELHI THAT THE RESPONDENT IN CONNIVANCE WITH OTHERS WAS INDULGING IN THE ACTIVITY OF SUPPLYING AND SELLING HUGE QUANTITY OF CHARAS TO A NUMBER OF PERSONS IN NAJAFGARH AREA AND IN HARYANA ALSO. THE INFORMATION WAS THAT HE WAS LIKELY TO SUPPLY A HUGE QUANTITY TO AN UNKNOWN PARTY ON 22-5-1993 AT 3 P.M. NEAR DHANSA BUS-STAND, NAJAFGARH, NEW DELHI. THIS INFORMATION WAS REGISTERED IN THE OFFICE OF CBI AND THE CASE WAS ENTRUSTED TO THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MEHAR SINGH.

2. ON 22-5-1993 THE SECRET INFORMER AGAIN CONTACTED THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE AND CONFIRMED THE INFORMATION. ACCORDINGLY, THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE MEHAR SINGH DISCUSSED THE MATTER WITH THE SP AND A RAIDING PARTY WAS ORGANISED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF MEHAR SINGH WHICH CONSISTED OF THE FOLLOWING PERSONS:

MR. DILBAGH SINGH, MR. PHOOL KUMAR, MR. JAGDISH CHAND, MR. JAIBIR SINGH,

MR. RAJINDER SAXENA, AND MR. AJAY SINGH.

3. THE RAIDING PARTY REACHED THE SPOT AT ABOUT 2 P.M. AFTER PARKING











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top