SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 826

RUMA PAL, S.B.SINHA
DABUR INDIA LTD. – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MEERUT – Respondent


ORDER

1. THE APPELLANT MANUFACTURES MEDICINAL PRODUCTS OUT OF HERBAL EXTRACTS.

THE QUESTIONS WHICH HAVE ARISEN IN THIS APPEAL, INTER ALIA, ARE WHETHER THE EXTRACTS WERE GOODS FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE CENTRAL EXCISE ACT AND IF SO, WHETHER THEY WERE CLASSIFIABLE UNDER CHAPTER 13 OR 30 OF THE ACT.

2. THE APPELLANT CARRIES ON ITS BUSINESS BOTH IN WEST BENGAL AS WELL AS IN UTTAR PRADESH. DEMANDS WERE RAISED IN RESPECT OF THE PERIOD 1-8-1990 TO 28-2-1994 BY REVENUE AUTHORITIES IN BOTH THE STATES ON THE BASIS THAT THE HERBAL EXTRACTS WERE LEVIABLE TO EXCISE DUTY UNDER CHAPTER 13. AS FAR AS WEST BENGAL WAS CONCERNED, THE RELEVANT ENTRIES WERE CONSTRUED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND IT WAS HELD THAT THE GOODS WERE PROPERLY CLASSIFIABLE UNDER CHAPTER 30 UNDER TARIFF ITEM 30.03. THE RATE OF DUTY AT THAT POINT OF TIME WAS NIL. HE ACCORDINGLY DROPPED THE PROCEEDINGS.

3. AS FAR AS UTTAR PRADESH WAS CONCERNED, HOWEVER, THE COMMISSIONER DECIDED THE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE APPELLANT HOLDING THAT THE EXTRACTS WERE PROPERLY CLASSIFIABLE UNDER CHAPTER 13. THE APPELLANTS FURTHER APPEAL TO THE TRIBUNAL FROM THIS DECISION WAS REJECTED AND THAT IS THE ORDER IMPUGNED BEFORE US.

4. THE RELEVANT ENTRIES IN CHAPTER 1







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top