SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 1060

K.G.BALAKRISHNAN, A.R.LAKSHMANAN
AVINASH SHETTY – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent


ORDER

1. LEAVE GRANTED.

2. THE APPELLANT WAS CONVICTED BY THE IIND ADDITIONAL CJM, MANGALORE FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 326 IPC. THE ALLEGATION WAS THAT ON 25-5-1993 AT ABOUT 11.45 P.M. HE ASSAULTED PW 1 DR. ISHWARAN BY USING SWORD. THE APPELLANT WAS SENTENCED TO UNDERGO RIGOROUS IMPRISONMENT FOR A PERIOD OF TWO YEARS AND TO PAY A FINE OF RS 5000, IN DEFAULT, TO UNDERGO SI FOR THREE MONTHS. THE CONVICTION AND SENTENCE WAS CHALLENGED BY THE APPELLANT BEFORE THE SESSIONS JUDGE, DAKSHINA KANNADA, MANGALORE AND THE SESSIONS COURT CONFIRMED THE CONVICTION AND SENTENCE. AGGRIEVED BY THE SAME, THE APPELLANT FILED REVISION BEFORE THE HIGH COURT AND THE SAME WAS DISMISSED. THE CONVICTION AND SENTENCE OF THE APPELLANT UNDER SECTION 326 IPC IS CHALLENGED BEFORE US.

3. WE HEARD LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANT AND COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENTS.

4. THE COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANT SUBMITTED THAT THE INJURIES SUSTAINED BY B PW 1 WERE NOT GRIEVOUS IN NATURE AND THE CONVICTION OF THE APPELLANT FOR THE OFFENCE UNDER SECTION 326 IPC IS NOT SUSTAINABLE IN LAW. OUR ATTENTION WAS DRAWN TO THE WOUND CERTIFICATE PREPARED BY PW 2. THERE WERE FOUR INJURIES ON THE BODY OF THE INJURED, PW 1. ADMITT






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top