SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 1230

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
S.N. VARIAVA, H.K. SEMA, JJ.
SANGEETA ALIAS SHREYA - PETITIONER
VERSUS
PRASANT VIJAY WARGIYA - RESPONDENT
TRANSFER PETITION (C) NO. 462 OF 2004,
DECIDED ON OCTOBER 4, 2004

Headnote:

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 25 - Matrimonial dispute - Transfer of - Wife sought transfer of case from Family Court, Gwalior, M.P. to the Family Court at Kota, Rajasthan - Contention that she had a 2½ year old child, and had no source of income - Respondent contented that he also had no source of income and apprehended threat to his life at Kota - Held between husband and wife the convenience of the wife must prevail particularly when the wife has a 2½ year old child- In case of threat to respondent, he can make a complaint to the court- Transfer petition allowed.[Paras 3 to 5]

ORDER

1. HEARD PARTIES.

2. THIS PETITION HAS BEEN FILED BY THE WIFE FOR TRANSFER OF CASE NO. 38 OF 2004 HMA TITLED AS PRASANT VIJAY WARGIYA V. SANGEETA, PENDING BEFORE THE PRESIDING JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BUNGALOW NO. 13, GANDHI ROAD, GWALIOR, M.P. TO THE FAMILY COURT, KOTA, RAJASTHAN.

3. THE GROUNDS FOR TRANSFER ARE THAT THE PETITIONER HAS A 2-1/2-YEAR-OLD CHILD AND THAT SHE HAS NO SOURCE OF INCOME. THE FURTHER GROUND IS THAT SHE IS NOT IN A POSITION TO TRAVEL ALONE. ALL THESE GROUNDS HAVE BEEN CONTROVERTED IN THE COUNTER-AFFIDAVIT. THE RESPONDENT CLAIMS THAT HE ALSO HAS NO INCOME. THE RESPONDENT ALSO CLAIMS THAT HE APPREHENDS THREATS TO HIS LIFE AND LIBERTY IF HE IS MADE TO GO TO KOTA, RAJASTHAN.

4. WE ARE STILL LIVING IN A CIVILISED SOCIETY. WE SEE NO SUBSTANCE IN THE SUBMISSION THAT THERE WOULD BE DANGER TO HIS LIFE IF THE RESPONDENT HAS TO ATTEND THE COURT IN KOTA. IF ANY THREAT IS GIVEN, THE RESPONDENT CAN ALWAYS COMPLAIN TO THAT COURT AND WE ARE SURE THAT HIS COMPLAINT, IF ONE MADE, WILL BE CONSIDERED ON ITS MERIT. BETWEEN A HUSBAND AND A WIFE THE CONVENIENCE OF THE WIFE MUST PREVAIL PARTICULARLY WHEN THE WIFE HAS A 2-1/2-YEAR-OLD CHILD.

5. IN THIS VIEW OF THE MATTER, WE TRANSFER CASE NO. 38 OF 2004 HMA TITLED AS PRASHANT VIJAY WARGIYA V. SANGEETA, PENDING BEFORE THE PRESIDING JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BUNGALOW NO. 13, GANDHI ROAD, GWALIOR, M.P. TO THE FAMILY COURT, KOTA, RAJASTHAN.

6. THE TRANSFER PETITION IS ALLOWED ACCORDINGLY.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top