SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 1096

SHIVARAJ V.PATIL, B.N.SRIKRISHNA
TEENA CHHABRA – Appellant
Versus
MANISH CHHABRA – Respondent


ORDER

1. THIS PETITION SEEKING TRANSFER OF PETITION NO. 1689 OF 2002, TITLED AS MANISH CHHABRA V. TEENA CHHABRA PENDING IN THE FAMILY COURT AT BANDRA, MUMBAI, TO THE COURT OF DISTRICT JUDGE, CHANDIGARH, IS FILED BY THE WIFE ON THE GROUND THAT SHE IS TOTALLY DEPENDENT ON HER PARENTS AND SHE HAS NO SOURCE OF INCOME TO TRAVEL TO BOMBAY TO ATTEND THE COURT PROCEEDINGS.

2. AT THE HEARING, THE LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT HUSBAND SUBMITTED THAT THE RESPONDENT IS READY AND WILLING TO BEAR THE EXPENSES OF THE PETITIONER WIFE FROM CHANDIGARH TO BOMBAY, WHENEVER HER PRESENCE IS REQUIRED AT BOMBAY FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS CASE, BY SECOND CLASS TRAIN FARE.

3. HAVING REGARD TO THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, WE DISMISS THIS TRANSFER PETITION, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITION THAT THE RESPONDENT WILL BEAR THE TRAVEL EXPENSES OF THE PETITIONER FROM CHANDIGARH TO BOMBAY, WHENEVER HER PRESENCE IS REQUIRED AT BOMBAY FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS CASE, BY SECOND CLASS TRAIN FARE AND RUPEES FIVE HUNDRED TOWARDS INCIDENTAL EXPENSES FOR LODGING AND BOARDING.

4. NO COSTS.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top