SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 1216

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
SHIVARAJ V. PATIL, B.N. SRIKRISHNA, JJ.
GHASITEY LAL SAHU AND ANOTHER - APPELLANTS
VERSUS
COMPETENT AUTHORITY, UNDER THE URBAN (CEILING AND REGULATION ACT, 1976), U.P. AND ANOTHER - RESPONDENTS.
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5992 OF 1999,
DECIDED ON SEPTEMBER 30, 2004

Subject

Land Law - Urban Land Ceiling

Act Referred

URBAN LAND CEILING AND REGULATION REPEAL ACT : S.4
URBAN LAND CEILING AND REGULATIONS ACT : S.10(3)

Headnote

Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, Section 10(3) - Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999, Section 4 - Abatement of proceedings - Contention that proceedings stood abated as per S. 4 of 1999 Act as proceedings still not initiated and possession not taken- Contention accepted- Appeal disposed of accordingly [Paras 1 and 3]

ORDER

1. AT THE HEARING, THE LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANTS PLACED BEFORE US A COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 5-1-2000 ADDRESSED TO THE APPELLANTS BY NARENDER NATH CHAUDHARY, ASSISTANT ENGINEER, URBAN LAND CEILING, KANPUR, WHEREIN IT IS CLEARLY STATED THAT THE PROCEEDINGS IN THIS CASE WILL ABATE UNDER SECTION 10(3) OF THE URBAN LAND (CEILING AND REGULATION) ACT, 1976, (FOR SHORT "THE E ACT") AS THE PROCEEDINGS HAVE NOT YET BEEN INITIATED. THE LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANTS URGED THAT HAVING REGARD TO SECTION 4 OF THE URBAN LAND (CEILING AND REGULATION) REPEAL ACT, 1999 (FOR SHORT "ACT OF 1999"), THE PROCEEDINGS ABATE. SHE ALSO SUBMITTED THAT THE POSSESSION OF THE LAND IN QUESTION HAS NOT BEEN TAKEN. SHE FURTHER SUBMITTED THAT, ALL ALONG, THERE HAD BEEN INTERIM ORDERS IN FAVOUR OF THE APPELLANTS AND THIS COURT ALSO HAD F GRANTED INTERIM ORDER ON 9-2-1998.

2. THE LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENTS STATES THAT IN VIEW OF THE LETTER AFOREMENTIONED, THE APPEAL MAY BE DISPOSED OF.

3. UNDER THESE CIRCUMSTANCES, HAVING REGARD TO SECTION 4 OF THE ACT OF 1999, THE PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE ACT ABATE. NOTHING MORE IS REQUIRED TO BE DONE IN THIS CASE. IN THIS VIEW, THE IMPUGNED ORDER WILL NOT HAVE ANY EFFECT AND SHALL NOT REMAIN IN OPERATION.

4. THE CIVIL APPEAL IS, ACCORDINGLY, DISPOSED OF.

5. NO COSTS.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top