SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 1174

A.R.LAKSHMANAN, K.G.BALAKRISHNAN
SHEIKH AYUB – Appellant
Versus
State Of M. P. – Respondent


ORDER

1. LEAVE GRANTED.

2. HEARD LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANT AND COUNSEL FOR THE STATE.

3. BY THE IMPUGNED ORDER THE APPELLANT WAS GRANTED BAIL AND DIRECTED TO DEPOSIT RS 2,50,000 WHICH IS ALLEGED TO BE THE AMOUNT MISAPPROPRIATED BY THE APPELLANT. THERE WAS ALSO CONDITION FOR FURNISHING SURETY BOND FOR RS 50,000. IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, DIRECTION TO DEPOSIT RS 2,50,000 WAS NOT WARRANTED, AS PART OF THE CONDITIONS FOR GRANTING BAIL.

4. HENCE, THE DIRECTION TO DEPOSIT RS 2,50,000 IS DELETED AND SUBJECT TO THIS MODIFICATION THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE GRANTING BAIL IS CONFIRMED.

5. THE APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF ACCORDINGLY.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top