SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 1118

SHIVARAJ V.PATIL, B.N.SRIKRISHNA
SOMA CHOUDHURY – Appellant
Versus
GOURAB CHOUDHAURY – Respondent


ORDER

1. HEARD LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE PARTIES.

2. THIS PETITION IS FILED BY THE WIFE SEEKING TRANSFER OF TITLE SUIT (DIVORCE) NO. 11 OF 2003 TITLED AS GOURAB CHOUDHURY V. SOMA CHOUDHURY PENDING BEFORE THE COURT OF DISTRICT JUDGE, SOUTH TRIPURA, UDAIPUR (TRIPURA) TO THE FAMILY COURT AT ALIPORE (WEST BENGAL) ON THE GROUNDS THAT THE PETITIONER HAS TO TRAVEL THE DISTANCE OF ABOUT 1700 KM FROM HER PRESENT RESIDENCE IN WEST BENGAL TO ATTEND THE COURT PROCEEDINGS AT TRIPURA; SHE HAS NO SOURCE OF INCOME WHATSOEVER AND SHE IS ENTIRELY DEPENDENT UPON HER FATHER, WHO IS A RETIRED GOVERNMENT SERVANT; SHE HAS ALREADY INITIATED PROCEEDINGS UNDER SECTION 125, CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE ("CRPC" FOR SHORT) FOR MAINTENANCE FROM THE RESPONDENT WHICH ARE PENDING IN THE COURT OF CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE AT ALIPORE (WEST BENGAL) AND THAT THE RESPONDENT IS A WEALTHY PERSON.

3. LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT HUSBAND RESISTED THE PETITION ON THE GROUND THAT THERE IS A THREAT TO HIS LIFE WHEN HE GOES TO ATTEND THE COURT AT WEST BENGAL.

4. HAVING REGARD TO THE GROUNDS ON WHICH THE TRANSFER PETITION IS FILED THAT THE PETITIONER HAS NO SOURCE OF INCOME, HAS ALREADY INITIATED PROCEEDINGS UNDER SECTION 125 CR

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top