SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 1239

ASHOK BHAN, S.H.KAPADIA
NAGAPPAN – Appellant
Versus
AMMASAI GOUNDERS – Respondent


ORDER

1. THIS APPEAL BY GRANT OF SPECIAL LEAVE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE JUDGMENT OF THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 831 OF 1992 WHEREIN THE HIGH COURT AFTER REVERSING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY THE FIRST APPELLATE COURT HAS DISMISSED THE SUIT FILED BY THE PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT. NAGAPPAN, THE APPELLANT HEREIN, IS THE SON OF RESPONDENT 4 PERIATHAMBI @ KARUPPANA GOUNDER (FATHER) AND RESPONDENT 5 SMT. KARUPPAYAMMAL (MOTHER).

2. RESPONDENT 4 EXECUTED A REGISTERED DEED OF SETTLEMENT ON 1-5-1963 IN FAVOUR OF THE APPELLANT AND APPOINTED RESPONDENT 5 AS HIS GUARDIAN AS THE APPELLANT WAS A MINOR AT THAT TIME. ON 21-5-1963 A PARTITION TOOK PLACE BETWEEN RESPONDENT 4, HIS FATHER AND HIS BROTHER. THE PARTITION WAS EFFECTED BY A REGISTERED DEED OF PARTITION. BY VIRTUE OF THIS DEED THE SUIT PROPERTY CAME TO BE ALLOTTED TO RESPONDENT 4. ACCORDING TO THE APPELLANT, THE COMBINED EFFECT OF THESE TWO DOCUMENTS IS THAT HE BECAME THE ABSOLUTE OWNER OF THE SUIT SCHEDULE PROPERTIES.

3. ON 6-7-1964, RESPONDENT 4 CREATED A MORTGAGE (EXHIBIT A-3) OF SUIT PROPERTY IN FAVOUR OF SELLABBA GOUNDER, HIS AUNTS HUSBAND. ON 6-6-1970 RESPONDENTS 4 AND 5 SOLD ITEM 1 OF THE PROPERTY VIDE













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top