SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 1024

K.G.BALAKRISHNAN, A.R.LAKSHMANAN
KISHORE KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
J. K. CORPORATION LTD. – Respondent


ORDER

1. LEAVE GRANTED.

2. HEARD LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE PARTIES.

3. THE APPELLANT HEREIN WAS CONVICTED FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 138 OF THE NI ACT AND SENTENCED TO UNDERGO IMPRISONMENT FOR A PERIOD OF SIX MONTHS WITH A FINE OF RS 2,20,650 AND IN DEFAULT OF PAYMENT OF FINE TO FURTHER UNDERGO IMPRISONMENT FOR TWO MONTHS.

4. THE APPELLANT AND THE COMPLAINANT SETTLED THE MATTER AMICABLY AND F MEMO OF SETTLEMENT IS PRODUCED BY THE PARTIES AND THE SETTLEMENT IS SIGNED BY THE PARTIES AS WELL AS THE COUNSEL FOR THE RESPECTIVE PARTIES.

5. IN VIEW OF THE SETTLEMENT, THE CONVICTION AND SENTENCE AGAINST THE APPELLANT IS SET ASIDE.

6. THE APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF ACCORDINGLY.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top